(Source: cuuukie, via beatledirt)
(Source: paulmcfruity, via beatowl)
George, Stuart Sutcliffe and John, Hamburg, 1960: Photo by Astrid Krichherr. [Scanned from George Harrison’s I, Me, Mine book]
It’s honestly making me mad at how many Leo fangirls are complaining about Matthew Mcconaughey winning for best actor instead of Leo, and saying how much Leo should’ve won instead. I’m a huge Leo fan, I think he’s a truly great actor, but that doesn’t mean he is automatically the best choice every year to win an Oscar rather than his contenders. I bet that a majority of people saying he should’ve won haven’t even bothered to watch Dallas Buyers Club (or Wolf On Wall Street), so it makes me mad at how many people claim he was snubbed. I feel that so many of his fans don’t look at each of his performances alone to see if it’s better than the rest, instead they just assume he should win one because he hasn’t yet. Plus, he’s been nominated four times for acting, not as much as people make it out to be. It still shows how good he is to get nominated four times, since it is hard to get a nomination, and each one is well-deserved, but it’s exaggerated a lot on the internet. I do hope he gets one eventually though, and am happy Matthew won this year.
Yeah, I loved The Wolf Of Wall Street and Leo is good in it but McConaughey's on fire this year, he really deserves it.
Also he’s one of those actors earning between a grotesque $20-30 million a film so he can get the fuck over it, can’t he? Why we who have had no Oscar nominations and are living off less than £10,000 a year are choosing to feel sorry for him beats me.
(Source: tobelostinthelabyrinth, via sleeping-on-a-dandelion)